Responsive behavior
At narrow widths, record context stacks above the status and actions wrap below it. Long labels can break without pushing the panel wider than its container.
Independent component demonstration / not client work
A fictional status-and-action component makes one systems question tangible: what should stay consistent as the work changes state, permission, and screen size?
This is an independent portfolio demonstration—not a client artifact or a claim about a historical implementation. The code is presented as an illustrative implementation concept, not attributed to Brian’s past work.
Interaction state
Use Tab to enter the state selector, then arrow keys to move. Home and End jump to the first and last states.
Behavior contract
Rendered component / fictional request
Service request / sample record
REQ-2841 · Assigned to Jordan Lee
Owner, status, and next action remain visible together.
Primary action
Illustrative action label; state controls above update this local preview only.
Responsive behavior
At narrow widths, record context stacks above the status and actions wrap below it. Long labels can break without pushing the panel wider than its container.
Implementation concept
type Status = "default" | "warning" | "blocked"
| "complete" | "read-only" | "loading" | "error";
const canAct = status !== "blocked"
&& status !== "read-only"
&& status !== "loading";Thinking through states at design time reduces ambiguity during implementation. A real product would still need permission rules, persistence, and error recovery connected to its services.
Specification